Even though I still hated planks at the end, my core felt tighter after doing them for 30 days straight, and my back felt awesome, too. French President Emmanuel Macron took first place, ahead of far-right leader Marine Le Pen, in the first round of France’s presidential election on Sunday, but he is on course for a far closer second-round clash than five years ago.
While polling suggests Macron should retain the presidency in two weeks, first round results show the incumbent can’t rest on his laurels.
Le Pen will be able to count on voters from far-right TV-pundit-turned-politician Eric Zemmour, who called on his supporters to back her on April 24. Meanwhile, leftist firebrand Jean-Luc Mélenchon fared better than expected and brings a heavy dose of uncertainty to the mix as his voters are a diverse bunch. Many are likely to abstain in the second round, while others will divide up between the French president and Le Pen.
Here are five takeaways from the presidential election’s first round:
“Politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed.”
France’s repeat of the 2017 runoff confirms Macron’s and Le Pen’s own political analysis: That the divide between the left and the right is no longer relevant in France and has been replaced by an opposition between a mainstream bloc that is pro-European and open to the outside world on one side, and nationalists on the other. Both candidates scored higher than five years ago, leaving the traditional right and left in an even more shambolic state than before. Macron went from 24 percent in 2017 in the first round to 27.6 percent Sunday and Le Pen went from 21.3 percent to 23.4 percent.
The gap between them is higher than last time around, showing that Macron has managed to drum up the most votes despite controversies in the campaign’s last mile, including over the state’s overuse of consulting firms. But the far-right bloc — Marine Le Pen, Eric Zemmour and nationalist Nicolas Dupont-Aignan combined — garnered than 30 percent of the total vote.
I describe the “fun” parts of Only Yesterday because they’re wonderful, but also to make a point about the origin story we’ve learned about the mood of the ’20s. Looking back at Allen’s work from the vantage point of 1986, historian David M. Kennedy argued that the biggest failing of the book was its lack of historical depth: “Rarely did Allen forge an explanatory chain whose links ran back more deeply into the past than 1917.” And indeed, Allen seemed to blame World War I for every ash-covered carpet and scarred dining table.
Allen is also really good at describing parties—or, at least, the ones the middle class and upper class attended. The historian wrote about how women taking up smoking had “strewed the dinner table with their ashes, snatched a puff between the acts, invaded the masculine sanctity of the club car, and forced department stores to place ornamental ash-trays between the chairs in their women’s shoe departments.” In what I think may be the best passage in the book, Allen described the way 1920s partygoers stepped all over every previous genteel convention:
Anyway, let’s get to that fun. A very joyful book to read about the decade is Frederick Lewis Allen’s Only Yesterday: An Informal History of the 1920s, which Allen—a blueblood journalist and editor at Harper’s—published in 1931. The book chronicles all of the movement and motion that makes the decade sexy, and doesn’t seem to miss a fad.
The property, complete with a 30-seat screening room, a 100-seat amphitheater and a swimming pond with sandy beach and outdoor shower, was asking about $40 million, but J. Lo managed to make it hers for $28 million. As the Bronx native acquires a new home in California, she is trying to sell a gated compound.
Popular in human interest:
Parents Are Fed Up With Their Kids’ Expensive Berry Habits
15 Mother’s Day Gifts for the Burned-Out Mom in Your Life
Really Though, What Jeans Are in Style Now?
Don’t Fall for Fertility Fearmongering About Trans Men
Perhaps by remembering the twenties merely as an enchanting series of novelties or the crude afterthought of a simpler past, we preserve the illusion of our own simple innocence,” mused historian Paula Fass in the introduction to her book The Damned and the Beautiful: American Youth in the 1920s.
Whether that means there will be a longer-term far-right alliance is an open question. Nicolas Bay and Gilbert Collard — two MEPs who left Le Pen’s party to join Zemmour — didn’t endorse a possible alliance with Le Pen, in case she wins the second round.
Zemmour, a 63-year-old TV pundit-turned-politician, was once tipped to come second behind Macron, back in October. But he plummeted spectacularly in the polls after suffering from a perceived lack of credibility as the Ukraine war started and former comments praising Russian President Vladimir Putin resurfaced. He scored a measly 7 percent. Despite their bitter and unrelenting fighting throughout the campaign, he swiftly endorsed Marine Le Pen.
“I have disagreements with Marine Le Pen,” Zemmour said at his concession speech Sunday, “but there is a man facing Marine Le Pen who has let in 2 million immigrants … who would therefore do worse if he were reelected — it is for this reason that I call on my voters to vote for Marine Le Pen.”
The modern landscape of relationships has shifted from physical interactions to “swipe left, swipe right,” a transition that brings both unparalleled opportunity and unexpected risks. This evolution was recently spotlighted on BBC Focus on Africa, where YouTuber Sharon Yamisa, known to her audience as “Nana,” shared her firsthand account of how quickly an online match can turn uncomfortable.
During the interview, Nana detailed her creepy dating app experiences, ranging from boundary-pushing requests for photos to the jarring realisation that a digital persona rarely matches reality.
Her story, alongside those of couples who found success, serves as a vital jumping-off point for a broader conversation on safety, boundaries, and the evolving role of parenting in a digital age.
Decoding digital red flags
In the physical world, a red flag might be a raised voice or a missed date. In the digital realm, they are often more subtle and manipulative. Common warning signs include love bombing, where a stranger showers a user with excessive affection to gain trust, or breadcrumbing, which involves sending just enough messages to keep someone interested without any intent of meeting.
For parents, the goal is to help young adults be digitally intuitive. This involves teaching them that if a profile feels too polished to be true, or if a conversation turns sexual prematurely, it is a boundary violation that warrants an immediate block.
Safe transition
The most vulnerable moment in online dating is the transition from a digital persona to a physical human being. To mitigate risk, individuals should adhere to a strict public-first rule:
Always meet in high-traffic, well-lit public areas.
Inform a friend or parent of the location and provide a check-in time.
Never rely on a date for a ride home on the first meeting; maintaining the ability to leave at any moment is a crucial safety barrier.
The mental health toll of dating apps
Parenting in a digital era requires acknowledging the psychological impact of dating apps. The almost fictional nature of net romance can lead to a hit on one’s self-esteem when matches are scarce or when ghosting occurs.
It is important to view dating apps as a tool, not a reflection of personal worth. Parents can support their adult children by encouraging digital detoxes, “touching some grass” and reminding them that meaningful connections often happen when they step away from the screen and engage with their local community.
Bridging a generational gap
There is often a disconnect between traditional views of meeting the family and the fast-paced nature of app dating. Parents who approach their children’s digital dating life with curiosity rather than judgment create a safer environment.
When a young adult feels they can discuss a creepy interaction without being told “I told you those apps were bad,” they are more likely to seek help when a situation actually becomes dangerous.
Are dating apps the answer to finding love?
Dating apps are not the answer to love, but rather a megaphone for finding it. They expand the social circle beyond one’s immediate geography, allowing people to meet who otherwise never would have crossed paths. However, they are merely a medium. The success of the relationship still depends on old-fashioned qualities: character, consistency, and communication.
For those who use them with high digital literacy and firm boundaries, apps can be a gateway to a lifelong partner. For those who enter the space without a safety net or a strong sense of self, the experience can be draining.
Ultimately, the answer to finding love remains the same as it was decades ago: it requires a balance of an open heart and a very cautious head.
For more, click HERE to join our WhatsApp channel!
In today’s tech saturated world, AI companions are being marketed as digital friends that offer emotional support. Apps like Replika and Character.AI simulate conversations, remember personal details and adapt to users over time. They’re always available, never tired and never judgmental.
With loneliness on the rise, especially after the pandemic, millions of people are turning to these platforms just to talk. But the real question remains: Do AI companions actually help our real-life relationships or do they quietly make things worse?
The rise of AI companions
AI companions rely on natural language processing to mimic empathy and hold human-like conversations. Replika positions itself as a “friend” or even a “partner,” while Character.AI allows users to create custom personalities that respond exactly how they want.
Their popularity surged after COVID-19, when isolation became normal and social energy dropped. The appeal is obvious: AI doesn’t judge, doesn’t argue and doesn’t reject you. It listens endlessly.
But this raises an important concern: what happens when comfort becomes easier than connection?
How AI can help real relationships
Used in moderation, AI can offer limited support. Some people use AI to vent after a stressful day. This can prevent emotional overload in real relationships. Others use it to organise thoughts before difficult conversations. Some studies show AI chats may reduce short term loneliness and improve mood. Feeling calmer can help people communicate better with partners, friends or family.
For people with social anxiety, AI can build confidence. It may encourage them to reach out to real people.
The hidden risks of AI companions
Long term use comes with risks. AI always agrees and reassures. Real people don’t. This can create unrealistic expectations in relationships. Normal conflict may start to feel “too hard.”
Dependency is another concern. Some users replace real conversations with AI. Over time, this can increase isolation, not reduce it.Younger users may struggle most. Heavy use can affect social skills and emotional development. AI also changes how people view intimacy. It offers comfort without effort or accountability. This can weaken empathy and patience in real relationships.
Why AI feels good but can be misleading
AI feels easy because it removes discomfort. There is no rejection or conflict. But real relationships require effort. Growth comes from disagreement, repair and vulnerability. AI cannot offer that.
It should be a tool, not a substitute.Use it for reflection, not emotional dependence. Set limits on usage. Prioritise real conversations, therapy and community. Remember AI only mimics empathy. It does not feel it.
The realistic verdict
AI companions can offer temporary comfort. In small doses, they may support communication and emotional regulation. However, overuse can lead to dependency, false expectations and reduced human connection. Real relationships improve through honesty, effort and accountability. Technology can assist but it cannot replace real human connection.
AI is an important tool with vast resources your child can capitalize on. Here are five smart ways to leverage AI to enhance your child’s learning journey.
AI is flexible
Online learning can take an on-the-go approach. AI tutors can be present at the drop of a hat. Meaning your toddler can not only learn when they are ready, but also that they can do it at a time that’s the most convenient to them.
Additionally, children who do not have a set location are afforded the luxury of a vast amount of knowledge at the tap of a button, which cuts down library visits and transport fees.
AI creates a safe space
Everyone has experienced it. The urge to ask a question to a teaching instructor, which is accompanied by the dread of being put off for some reason. Everyone wants to gain more knowledge, but it often comes at a risk. The risk of being ridiculed or the risk of failing.
It is easier for some than others, but with artificial intelligence there are no risks. Only endless chances, especially for those with attention or learning impairments.
The Multimedia aspect
AI simply isn’t about soulless videos online and ChatGPT. It is a complex world that enmeshes code and various sources of media. You can create PowerPoints, formulaic music, and documented summaries in a flash.
Contrary to real-world tutors who have to rely on information that has been passed down from others and PowerPoints that have to be made in advance. AI generates these resources instantly, which are useful for revision or during slim time crunches.
Parental oversight
When parents send their children into the world, there are risks that can’t be truly prepared for or briefed on. The human condition may be what we are most familiar with, but it sure is hard to predict.
With AI we can monitor our children’s progress, learn their weaknesses, and customize experiences that not only weed out their weaknesses but also bolster their strengths as well.
Special attention even when it’s not needed
In classrooms students may fall into the category of those who are singled out. The children who fall between the cracks. With their instructors or other learners.
With AI, undivided attention is focused on your young one. Custom lessons, personalized syllabus, and even positive feedback. AI with proper prompts will never lead your young one astray. It provides an ally whose aid you won’t regret enlisting.
AI accounts for time
There are heartbreaking anecdotes of children who veer to the dark corners of the web, which further derails their educational efforts. Or the recounting of youth who veer to the unmonitored web without adult supervision.
With AI it is easy to keep track of this through the use of cookies, letting you keep a record of your child’s efforts and escapades.
AI is an important tool to mankind. One that can help us or harm us. When education comes in the picture, there’s a plethora of outcomes for each.